A comparison of approaches for assessing covariate effects in latent class analysis
Keywords:ALSPAC, latent class analysis, trajectories, bias, three-step
Mixture modelling is a commonly used technique for describing longitudinal patterns of change, often with the aim of relating the resulting trajectory membership to a set of earlier risk factors. When determining these covariate effects, a three-step approach is often preferred as it is less computationally intensive and also avoids the situation where each new covariate can influence the measurement model, thus subtly changing the outcome under study. Recent simulation work has demonstrated that estimates obtained using three-step models are likely to be biased, particular when classification quality (entropy) is poor. Using both simulated data and empirical data from a large United Kingdom(UK)-based cohort study we contrast the performance of a range of commonly used three-step techniques. Bias in parameter estimates and their precision were determined and compared to new bias-adjusted three-step methods that have recently become available. The bias-adjusted three-step procedures were markedly less biased than the simpler three-step methods. Proportional Maximum Likelihood (ML), with its complex-sampling robust estimation, suffered from negligible bias across a range of values of entropy. Whilst entropy was related to bias for all methods considered, there was evidence that class-separation for each pairwise comparison may also play an important role. Under some circumstances a standard three-step method may provide unbiased covariate effects, however on the basis of these results we would recommend the use of bias-adjusted three-step estimation over these standard methods.
Authors who published with Longitudinal and Life Course Studies Volumes 1–9 agreed to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal right of first publication with the work, simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Following first publication in this Journal, Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal, provided always that no charge is made for its use.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.